BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Faculty of Arts and Humanities | University of Macau - ECPv5.15.0.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Faculty of Arts and Humanities | University of Macau
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://fah.um.edu.mo
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Faculty of Arts and Humanities | University of Macau
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Macau
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20190101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Macau:20191115T140000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Macau:20191115T140000
DTSTAMP:20260504T210738
CREATED:20201023T091231Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201023T091231Z
UID:6298-1573826400-1573826400@fah.um.edu.mo
SUMMARY:FAH-DCLL Academic Seminar: “Quoting of the Shuowen Jiezi in the Explanation of the Shijing by Duan Yuzai’s Shijing Xiaoxue—–A Critical Study” by Prof. Lee Hung Kai 人文學院中國語言文學系學術講座：“段玉裁《詩經小學》 引《說文解字》釋經考”- 李雄溪教授
DESCRIPTION:摘要：段玉裁《詩經小學》為研究《詩經》詞義之著作，當中援引許慎《說文解字》以佐解《經》之處甚多。本文透過分析具體例子，從“細釋詞義”、“說明通假”、“明異體字”、“指出異文”、“引錄籀文”、“明古今字”六方面去說明段氏引《說文解字》釋《詩經》之作用。此外，對比《詩經小學》和《說文解字注》的有關訓釋，可知段氏研治《詩經》和文字學之理路。
URL:https://fah.um.edu.mo/event/fah-dcll-academic-seminar-quoting-of-the-shuowen-jiezi-in-the-explanation-of-the-shijing-by-duan-yuzais-shijing-xiaoxue-a-critical-study-by-prof-lee-hung/
LOCATION:E21-3118
CATEGORIES:Department of Chinese language and Literature
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://fah.um.edu.mo/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/poster_e69d8ee99b84e6baaae69599e68e88-848x1200-1.jpg
ORGANIZER;CN="Department%20of%20Chinese%20Language%20and%20Literature":MAILTO:fah.chinese@um.edu.mo
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Macau:20191115T154500
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Macau:20191115T154500
DTSTAMP:20260504T210738
CREATED:20201023T091605Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201023T091605Z
UID:6303-1573832700-1573832700@fah.um.edu.mo
SUMMARY:FAH-DCLL Academic Seminar: “Why Chinese doesn’t have a major class of adjectives: A revisit based on new evidence” by Prof. Zhang Min 人文學院中國語言文學系學術講座：“再論漢語沒有獨立形容詞類：從比較證據及內部證據看”- 張敏教授
DESCRIPTION:摘要：在有獨立形容詞類的世界語言裡，形容詞的原型功能是直接作定語（名詞短語裡的修飾語），一般不能直接作謂語（它是動詞的原型功能）（Croft 1991、Hengeveld 1992）。漢語語法學界鑒於動詞、形容詞均可直接作謂語，傳統上將二者合歸「謂詞」；一些學者還認爲漢語的形容詞在句法層面也不能直接作定語。因此「漢語沒有獨立的形容詞類」成爲主流看法。上述看法在近年來受到一些直接的挑戰，如Dixon（2004）、Paul（2005、2015） 等（尤其是後者，論證頗有力度）；此外一些針對確有獨立形容詞類的語言的研究也對上述看法構成間接挑戰，如Larson（1998）、Cinque（2014）等有關日爾曼語、羅曼語裡形容詞性NP/DP修飾語之別的研究。本講以現代漢語內、外兩方面證據說明，新近提出的反證均不足以推翻原有的看法。
URL:https://fah.um.edu.mo/event/fah-dcll-academic-seminar-why-chinese-doesnt-have-a-major-class-of-adjectives-a-revisit-based-on-new-evidence-by-prof-zhang-min-%e4%ba%ba%e6%96%87%e5%ad%b8%e9%99%a2/
LOCATION:E21-3118
CATEGORIES:Department of Chinese language and Literature
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://fah.um.edu.mo/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/poster_e5bcb5e6958fe69599e68e88-848x1200-1.jpg
ORGANIZER;CN="Department%20of%20Chinese%20Language%20and%20Literature":MAILTO:fah.chinese@um.edu.mo
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR