BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Faculty of Arts and Humanities | University of Macau - ECPv5.15.0.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Faculty of Arts and Humanities | University of Macau
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://fah.um.edu.mo
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Faculty of Arts and Humanities | University of Macau
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20250101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20251106T160000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20251106T173000
DTSTAMP:20260513T081704
CREATED:20251104T062205Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251104T062205Z
UID:1208660-1762444800-1762450200@fah.um.edu.mo
SUMMARY:FAH-DENG Guest Lecture: "From Technological to Digital Reproducibility: Teaching Literature in the Age of A.I"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: \nSince the public release of ChatGPT in November 2022\, intense debates have emerged within the humanities—and literary studies in particular—concerning the practice of teaching literature at universities. In this talk\, I will explore these debates through the lens of Walter Benjamin’s concept of “technological reproducibility\,” developed during the 1930s to describe the emergence of photography and film. \nToday\, much digital content—including digitized literature—is instantly reproducible\, transmissible\, and marketable via online platforms and networks. Literary texts can also be repurposed as training data for Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT\, which may then be used by writers and students to generate new content. These developments raise critical questions: Is digital reproducibility fundamentally different from what Benjamin termed technological reproducibility? And if so\, what are the implications not only for the teaching of literature but also for literature itself? \nBiography: \nAngus Nicholls is Professor of Comparative Literature and German at Queen Mary University of London. His books include Myth and the Human Sciences (2015)\, Goethe’s Concept of the Daemonic (2006)\, Friedrich Max Müller and the Role of Philology in Victorian Thought (co-edited with John Davis\, 2017)\, and Thinking the Unconscious: Nineteenth-Century German Thought (co-edited with Martin Liebscher\, 2010). He was formerly co-editor of the journals History of the Human Sciences (Sage) and Publications of the English Goethe Society (Routledge). His current book project is a presentist history of Comparative Literature as an academic discipline\, focusing on the second half of the nineteenth century.
URL:https://fah.um.edu.mo/event/fah-deng-guest-lecture-from-technological-to-digital-reproducibility-teaching-literature-in-the-age-of-a-i/
LOCATION:E21A-G038
CATEGORIES:Department of English
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://fah.um.edu.mo/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/poster-scaled.jpg
ORGANIZER;CN="Department%20of%20English":MAILTO:fah.english@um.edu.mo
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20251115T090000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20251116T180000
DTSTAMP:20260513T081704
CREATED:20250507T080355Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260126T093908Z
UID:1092826-1763197200-1763316000@fah.um.edu.mo
SUMMARY:THE 3RD CONFERENCE ON EVIDENTIALITY AND ITS RELATED CATEGORIES
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://fah.um.edu.mo/event/the-3rd-conference-on-evidentiality-and-its-related-categories/
LOCATION:E21-G035
CATEGORIES:Department of English
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://fah.um.edu.mo/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/the-3rd-conference-on-evidentiality-and-its-related-categories-12-11-2025-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20251121T110000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20251121T123000
DTSTAMP:20260513T081704
CREATED:20251107T074957Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251107T075042Z
UID:1211174-1763722800-1763728200@fah.um.edu.mo
SUMMARY:FAH-DENG: "AI\, the Spectacle\, and Marx: Who is using the tech and for what purposes?"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: \nMarx urged the proletariat not to rally against new kinds of machines per se\, even if at first glance fears arose that these could further their subjugation and alienation.  Rather\, the point is who is deploying these technologies\, and for what purposes.  Behind the spectacle and moral panic about the new\, there may be something very familiar\, once we look more closely. \nFears of new machines and new technologies have been around for as long as they have emerged\, with worries about the changes and dangers they will bring\, and moral panics about the effects on people and society.  There were early fears about the train\, about physically riding it\, but also about this new kind of mobility in society.  There have been moral panics about all new kinds of media\, such as books and television\, each imagined to lead to delinquency and moral decline.  Fears of the computer in the 1950s were perhaps the start of some of the spectacular fears we have about AI now\, with imaginaries of human-mechanical hybridity and technological autonomy (Grenham\, 2020).  Although these were also rooted in wider fears about the new technologies of science and medicine\, viewed through a trope of a ‘violation of the natural order’ (Carroll\, 2004\, p. 40).  The ‘overreacher plot’ is well-trodden in science fiction and horror\, where the scientist extends the boundaries of the natural and thereby creates a monster (Carroll\, 2004\, p. 118). \nFollowing the advice of Marx\, Critical Discourse Studies scholars have an important role in regard to AI.  We need to look beyond the spectacle\, the wild fantasies and moral panics\, and consider carefully where this new technology is being deployed in a concrete sense\, by whom\, and for what underlying aims.  And as is the job of CDS\, to consider the effects of this on knowledge\, on society and the wellbeing of people.  In this talk I look at one small\, yet concrete\, case of using AI to manage levels of theft in stores in Japan.  I use this to consider some of the kinds of questions we might\, in the humanities\, need to be asking. \n  \nBiography: \nGwen Bouvier (PhD\, University of Wales) is a Distinguished Professor at Shanghai International Studies University\, Institute of Language Science.  Her main research interests are digital communication and civic debate on social media.  Professor Bouvier’s publications have drawn on critical discourse analysis\, multimodality based on social semiotics\, and online ethnography.  She is the Associate Editor for Social Semiotics and Book Review Editor for Discourse & Society\, and the Journal of Multicultural Discourses.  Her latest publications include the book Qualitative Research Using Social Media (Routledge\, 2022) and the articles Cancel Culture and Trigger-Ready Fragmented Interest Groups (TV and New Media\, 2025); Social Media and the New Canon of Use for Social Protests (Discourse\, Context and Media\, 2025); and Evaluating the American-Chinese Trade War on Chinese Social Media: Discourses of nationalism and rectifying a humiliating past (Critical Discourse Studies\, 2025).
URL:https://fah.um.edu.mo/event/fah-deng-ai-the-spectacle-and-marx-who-is-using-the-tech-and-for-what-purposes/
LOCATION:E21A-3118
CATEGORIES:Department of English
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://fah.um.edu.mo/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/poster-1-scaled.jpg
ORGANIZER;CN="Department%20of%20English":MAILTO:fah.english@um.edu.mo
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20251121T160000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20251121T170000
DTSTAMP:20260513T081704
CREATED:20251117T084131Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251117T084433Z
UID:1214020-1763740800-1763744400@fah.um.edu.mo
SUMMARY:FAH-DENG: "Workflow Matters: Comparing Human Translators and Multi-Agent LLMs in Literary Translation"
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: \nThe lecture explores how translation workflows affect performance in both human and AI literary translation.  Large language models (LLMs) perform well in general translation but often struggle with literary nuance and coherence. Professional human translations are compared with two multi-agent LLM systems: one modeled on human practice with drafting and revision phases\, and another redesigned for LLM capabilities with specialized agents for planning\, style\, and coherence. Expert evaluations show that both AI systems achieved accuracy comparable to human translators. The LLM-oriented workflow produced more stylistically rich and fluent translations\, occasionally with creative additions\, whereas the human-modeled workflow was concise but less cohesive. The findings suggest that workflows optimized for LLM capabilities can yield exceptional literary translations and\, in certain aspects\, surpass human performance. \n  \nBiography: \nKanglong Liu is Associate Professor in the Department of Language Science and Technology at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. His research focuses on empirical approaches to translation studies\, translation pedagogy\, corpus-based translation research\, and Hongloumeng translation studies. His work has appeared in leading journals such as Target\, Perspectives\, Lingua\, Language Sciences\, International Journal of Specialised Translation\, System\, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching\, and Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. He serves as Associate Editor of Translation Quarterly\, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (SSCI and AHCI)\, and Heliyon (SCI). He is the author of Corpus-Assisted Translation Teaching: Challenges and Issues (Springer\, 2020) and co-editor of several volumes\, including Translation and Interpreting in the Age of COVID-19 (Springer\, 2023)\, Dream of the Red Chamber: Literary and Translation Perspectives (Routledge\, 2023)\, Corpora in Interpreting Studies: East Asian Perspectives (Routledge\, 2023)\, and Translation Studies in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (Routledge\, 2025).
URL:https://fah.um.edu.mo/event/fah-deng-workflow-matters-comparing-human-translators-and-multi-agent-llms-in-literary-translation/
LOCATION:E21A-G049
CATEGORIES:Department of English
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://fah.um.edu.mo/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/poster-2-scaled.jpg
ORGANIZER;CN="Department%20of%20English":MAILTO:fah.english@um.edu.mo
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR