BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Faculty of Arts and Humanities | University of Macau - ECPv5.15.0.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Faculty of Arts and Humanities | University of Macau
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://fah.um.edu.mo
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Faculty of Arts and Humanities | University of Macau
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20230101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20230823T173000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20230823T190000
DTSTAMP:20260505T142946
CREATED:20230821T080523Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230821T080523Z
UID:631643-1692811800-1692817200@fah.um.edu.mo
SUMMARY:FAH/DPHIL Lecture Series – “Are conspiracy theories just theories about conspiracies?” by Prof. M. R. X. Dentith\, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai
DESCRIPTION:Zoom: https://umac.zoom.us/j/92442442030 \nPassword: 075742 \n  \nAbstract \nIn the academic debate concerning the apparent problem of belief conspiracy theories\, a lot of ink is still being spilt as to what\, exactly\, counts as a ‘conspiracy theory’. Whilst some conspiracy theory theorists argue that we should keep to the evaluative or normative elements that are commonly found in ordinary language conceptions of what counts as a ‘conspiracy theory’ (that they are ‘mad. bad\, and dangerous’) others have argued that a non-pejorative definition is more useful when seeking to analyse what\, if anything\, is wrong with such theories. By surveying that debate—which is occurring across multiple disciplines—we can see that whatever definitional choice we choose to make in our own work\, it will have serious implications which will affect how we conduct our research into what\, if anything\, is problematic about belief in these things called ‘conspiracy theories’. \n  \nBio \nProfessor M. R. X. Dentith is a leading scholar in contemporary social epistemology\, especially concerning the epistemic status of conspiracy theories and theorizers. Professor Dentith has published extensively in leading philosophical journals such as Synthese\, Social Epistemology\, and Episteme. He has also published a monograph\, The Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories\, with Palgrave Macmillan.
URL:https://fah.um.edu.mo/event/fah-dphil-lecture-series-are-conspiracy-theories-just-theories-about-conspiracies-by-prof-m-r-x-dentith-beijing-normal-university-at-zhuhai/
LOCATION:E21-3118
CATEGORIES:Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://fah.um.edu.mo/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/poster-m-r-x-dentith.jpg
ORGANIZER;CN="Department%20of%20Philosophy%20and%20Religious%20Studies":MAILTO:maggiewong@um.edu.mo
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR